It would ruin the whole point of taking her. Nobody brings along extra tuxedoes (although Bond did have a spare in this movie).įor my partner to get under the shower and cry with the evening gown I bought her.would be way too much.

But an extra suit would add too much weight to luggage that would presumably also include 'gadgets' like product samples, etc. I bring along extra ties and shirts in case I was stupid enough to order spaghetti with tomato sauce at a meal (stupid idea for a professional on the road). I sometimes bring a woman friend along whom I've bought an evening gown for (next week I will go to Karlovy Vary and Kotek to hang around the locales where the movie was shot and I will wear a tuxedo).Īnd one thing that you DON'T do above all other don'ts while travelling.is let anything happen to your suit that cannot be quickly solved by an iron and/or some soda water. I am really OK with the depiction of Venice water being so deep that a house can sink into a canal and a man would still get to dive deep into clear swimming pool water to rescue someone (Venice water is dirty and black and would even murkier if plaster had just crumbled into it).īut I like the idea of living the Bond lifestyle of travelling around Europe doing business and bringing along both a suit and a tuxedo. It was certainly OK that Bond actually kills bad guys in this adaptation, where, in the novel, he just watches people die around him the entire time. I was quasi-OK with the way the screenwriters felt it would be politically incorrect to show how Bond really got his first two kills: sniping a Japanese code breaker through a New York City skyscraper window and then killing a fellow agent from Norway who was also working for the Germans (Bond got his 00 status in World War Two). I really loved this adaption of 'Casino Royale' and didn't mind a lot of the unnecessary rewrites like the playing of Texas Hold'em.

2006 casino royale springfield script